Without going into specifics, a recent circumstance gave me reason to pause and consider internet safety at ISKL, prompting a couple of questions:
What are we doing to educate students, teachers and parents?
What can we be doing?
What are we doing to educate students, teachers and parents?
We have a ‘Student Technology Code of Conduct’, each student signs this document, and pretty much won’t see it again… unless they do something wrong. For parents there have been presentations during coffee mornings, but for teachers very little has been done. As Dennis Harter alluded to on his Thinking Allowed blog, ‘Online Safety is for Teachers Too’, web 2.0 technology and sites such as FaceBook and MySpace are making this a real issue.
What can we be doing?
Just as we have an ‘Earth Week’ and a ‘Sun Safety Week’, why not an ‘Internet Safety Week’?
Below I’ve brainstormed a few ideas; I’d be interested to hear from others with suggestions:
“Internet Safety Presentation” at a faculty meeting, preferably before the week.
A session with students where the ‘Student Technology Code of Conduct’ is discussed in detail and signed.
Poster competition
Short video competition.
Guest speaker, possibly from US Embassy.
Article for School Publication
Maybe a theme for each day of the week:
Monday – Cyber bullying
Tuesday – Plagiarism
Wednesday – Safe Surfing
Thursday – Protecting your online identity
Friday – Social Networking (FaceBook, MySpace etc.)
I would be really interested to hear what people think of an ‘Internet Safety Week’. When would be a good time? How to keep the focus on Internet Safety after the week has come and gone?
Today’s bullies don’t just want your lunch money, they want to trash your reputation.
Yikes this was the first line of an article by Elissa Baxter in ‘The Age Online’ titled: “Cyber intimidation and the art of bullying.” I’d hoped my first foray into the world of blogging would have had a more positive tone, however this article and several similar recent articles piqued my interest:
What are we doing in response? What can we do in response?
What can we do legally?
What is the impact of cyber bullying?
In Baxter’s article, she quotes a 16 year old student who was a victim of cyber bullying, using SMS: “One of the things I found so upsetting was that after I had been bullied, home was no longer a refuge….You can be at home or at the shops, anywhere really, and be getting threatening messages. You don’t know where the bully might be so you don’t know if you’re in danger. You really have no idea what’s happening.” To not feel safe in ones own home is shocking to me. Cyberbullying is sneaky and could be considered more insidious than the more traditional form of physical bullying. And who is this bully? The modern bully is no longer the Nelson Muntz character of the Simpsons (Bart’s chief protagonist), as Melanie Epstein noted, “our preliminary research shows that students who bully online are not the same children who bully face-to-face….It’s anonymity that is the key to it – they don’t think they’re going to get caught.” Clearly there seems to be a perception that with anonymity “personal responsibility is diminished, so antisocial things can occur.”
The traditional type of bullying typically occurred between students i.e. both the perpetrator and the victim were students. With cyberbullying this is no longer the case, teachers are often the victims, and with the anonymous nature of these attacks, the perpetrator could be a student, colleague or even a parent. Many of the recent law suites in the states have been education departments defending their staff, the victims of cyberbullying. More often than not, they have been unsuccessful on the grounds of ‘freedom of speech’.
What are we doing in response? What can we do in response?
Clearly cyberbullying is different to traditional bullying, and as such must be handled differently. While the bullying often occurs outside the school, we are not absolved of responsibility. This would be hypocritical since we constantly promote that cyberspace provides an extension to our classrooms. So what can we do:
o Develop a clear and comprehensive ‘Technology Code of Conduct’. Our code includes a paragraph : The school expects that students will not publish inappropriate materials. Inappropriate publishing includes, but is not limited to, personal attacks, harassment, illegal activities, and publishing private or personal details. This information should not be posted on any network. (I like the wording, but it is not clear that this policy covers infractions both on and OFF campus) o Raise awareness through a CYBERBULLYING poster campaign around the computer labs. I particularly like a strategy used atWilliam Penn School to tweak a student’s conscience, the IT Director placed a mirror in a lab, bearing the caption “Are you a cyber bully?” with action steps for kids who think they’re victims as well. o Present the ‘Cyberbullying-Talent Show’ video on assembly, and speak about the associated issues, implications of cyberbullying and consequences for both the victims and perpetrators. If you haven’t seen the video, it’s worth the 52seconds to watch it. o Educate faculty by speaking at meetings, advocating that we are responsible for ensuring all curriculum areas promote positive peer relationships, communication and social skills. o Where possible, know when bullying has occurred. This is easier said than done, when students are operating within a ‘Code of Silence’ (or is that Cone of Silence?). We are now trialling monitoring hardware that tracks key words that are associated with cyberbullying.
What can we legally do in response?
Scott McLeod over at Dangerously Irrelevent created a fascinating multi-media presentation “Administrators Guide to CyberBullying” (about 20 minutes long), while focussing on laws and cases within the US legal system, it looks at students’, teachers’ and school’s legal rights and precedents with regard to CyberBulling. In this presentation, Scott identifies 5 principles:
School have an affirmative obligation to protect students and/or employees from harassing, threatening and/or bullying conduct.
The default rule is that student speech in schools is protected.
Schools may discipline students for out-of-school conduct that substantially interferes with the normal operations of the school.
If they have a strong acceptable use policy, schools can regulate student cyberspeech if done during school time and/or using school computers.
Schools have more leeway with employees
Malaysian law considers cyberbullying a crime, under Section 211 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998: “No content applications service provider, or other person using a content applications service, shall provide content which is indecent, obscene, false, menacing, or offensive in character with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any person.”
While I have much to learn about blogging, I guess the best way to start is to jump in head first. I hope this first post promotes discussion about Cyberbullying and even better some action.
